I feel I did not make much progress the last week, I realised I wasted two days looking for error in my code and I finally found the error elsewhere. As for preparation to push my developments to review, I had rebased my tree. That is, I had picked up the developments done by other people in to my setup. My mistake. While the error still persists there in the master tree, in the process of recovering my platform I learned that there are two types of SOIC-8 SPI flash chips, ones that fit in the miniature socket I have and ones that are physically too large. The spare chips I had were of the second type and that slowed down my system recovery procedure radically. New flash chips are waiting for pickup in the store now.
This is actually just the situation I want coreboot to deal with better in the future: doing a firmware upgrade without the risk of bricking the device to the point where you need to use an external programmer device to recover. Problem is specifically with laptops, which may take a good hour or so to disassemble and put back together, and with every disassembly the risk of breaking some of those miniature connectors increases.
My plan of having two copies of firmware in the same flash chip image just got a bit more complicated. I learned that with recent platforms using a so-called binary blob for raminit, aka. system-agent binary, it is not possible to do a type of dual-boot-prefix setup I had planned, since one cannot put two system-agent binaries in the same CBFS image. I hope the system-agent build and release process is seriously improved to overcome this issue as badly gone(/done) binary blob upgrade procedure was the root-cause of my troubles the past week.
I have not really had a chance to test pre-OS flashing with FILO (actually the code might not yet be available for me to download). Instead I have attacked the low-level PCI and IO sources to reduce a good two or three copies from coreboot tree, this will help my efforts in the long run with SerialICE integration work.
EHCI, USB, LOL, OTG, CBMEM, OMG, CAR. Those have been the topics of my first week of GSoC on the coreboot tree. Dozen or so patches in, same amount waiting on approvals or further actions from me. I was glad to find my mentors with many ideas for refactoring and working actively on reviews. Nice start I would say!
It turned out usbdebug support in coreboot may not be very widely tested, hardware has typically had serial ports available for the same task. With some required bugfixes on cache-as-ram and CBMEM, I now have identical output on usbdebug when compared for CBMEM console and serial console. For my setup, that is. More needs to be done to get AMD boards supported once again. I also get to fix usbdebug receive side to make it a usable pipe for GDB and SerialICE, and I want it to handle USB errors and disconnects gracefully.
On the debugging hardware side things have brightened up quite a bit. While the original Net20DC product is discontinued, I was concerned the only solution is the DIY version pictured on the right. I have then received positive feedback and testing from the community (thanks Denis and Aaron) of using some inexpensive ARM boards as USB debug gadgets. To make them work flawlessy, some modification needs to be done on the USB gadget framework drivers on the kernel side. I should try to find someone already familiar with the gadgets to take this development task as I believe it is of interest for kernel developers too.
Some principal decisions on payloads have been made. I would first add usbdebug support for FILO. I am eagerly waiting for the FILO payload with flashrom to be released, this would gain us methods to program the system flashchip from USB storage, in a pre-os environment.
Hello. I am Kyösti Mälkki and I will be working on improvements for coreboot debugging tools during my GSoC 2013. My GSoC project plan has some details on things to come, but deliverables and schedule there will be fine-tuned next week or so. All in all, my work here should make it a little less painful to port new mainboards to coreboot and make SerialICE use more flexible.
Some feedback I have already received and the discussion we had on #coreboot suggests that some ARM boards are good candidates to be used for debugging x86 targets. Keep tuned in, the success of my work depends heavily on getting test results from a variety of mainboards.